Some critics even term gun control as a form of people-control wherein you surrender everything you possess when you are a victim of a criminal act. Second, where do you get the idea that someone bound on committing murder (in contravention to laws against it) will be stopped by a law saying they cannot have a gun? Since there were gun laws when the second amendment was created, having gun laws now isn’t anything new, or going against the 2nd amendment. 300,000,000 guns in private hands is a Brady Bunch wish, it is a lot closer to 400 million, over a hundred million background checks had been done by the FBI years ago. Criminals will find ways to obtain illegal firearms, like they do in every country. Chris Sununu to act after mass shootings in Texas and Ohio. As you see, most criminals get their guns from someone they know. Over the past 200 years, the need for weapons, especially firearms for the express purpose of self defense from nature has drastically reduced. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. Is the argument that a tyrannical government needs to be fought with guns, even valid in the 21st century? This is a more common argument than you might think. Or a machine gun that can fire hundreds of rounds per minute? We try to make TeenInk.com the best site it can be, and we take your feedback very seriously. Whats wrong, too scared to post contradictory facts and data you cant prove wrong, shame, not only do you want to eliminate the 2nd amendment, now you want to eliminate the 1st amendment like a good little Stalin did! Background checks have done a pretty good job of stopping Criminals and Lunatics from acquiring TRACEABLE guns but no one can show that there are any less out there with guns that cannot be traced back to them. ). Gun lobbyists hide behind the ‘Second Amendment’ saying that it gives them a constitutional right to own and bear arms, however, if we take a closer look at the Second Amendment itself, it talks about ‘militia’, an army or a fighting force that will protect the ‘state’ and has rights to bear arms for this specific purpose, not individuals claiming their own defense from imagined enemies. In conclusion, gun control is necessary for a safe place for all. Imagine that, people disarmed by the law unable to even try to stop the lunatic. If firearms were less prevalent in society, criminals would have greater difficulty laying hands on them. Therefore if, “everyone has the right to bear arms” then young children are qualified to have guns. (Jose Luis Magana / Associated Press) Many people out there are supporting the “anti- gun control cause” with the excuse of “self-defense”. The violent crime rate in the U.S. has dropped five times faster that the violent crime rate in Australia since they changed thier gun laws. Do people need to arm themselves to the teeth and hope to make last stands fighting against Big Brother? A UNODC report stated that 67% of all homicides in the US are related to gun violence. The government has banned the transfer of arms to minors and thus, limited access to assault weapons. If a man tries to commit a school shooting, but one of the teachers has a gun, and shoots the man... that would save lives. Has this resulted in the lowering of gun crime? According to facts about gun control, almost 39 percent of the population of America has in recent years, voted to ban guns and other firearms in the United States. Jul 05, 2017. Murder is illegal. Opinion Political Op-Eds Social Commentary Countries other than the U.S. have been successful with their gun laws. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. . Famous frontiersmen like Daniel Boone, Davy Crockett and Wild Bill Hickok were famous for their prowess with guns, and their legends. The subject of gun control has always generated a social and political debate concerning the availability and restriction of firearms within the United States. A gun-ban or stricter laws on sale and ownership will make sure this ‘harmless’ activity remains so. The mentally ill perpetrator in the Virginia Tech massacre exploited a loophole in the documentation requirements for purchasing guns, which enabled him to avoid the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). ). Guns are dangerous and have gotten into the wrong hands too many times. No guns are allowed there! The Second Amendment was required when America was a young country trying to consolidate its boundaries, and the citizens needed arms to defend themselves against foreign aggression, but today when the US has the 2nd largest army in the world and bills $700 billion a year in defense budgets, it does seem a bit extreme. Almost nothing in your article is accurate. They help protect citizens from people like James E. Holmes, who went into a movie theater, on July 20, 2012 and shot and killed 12 people, and injured 58 (Mother Jones, "US Mass Shootings, 1982-2012: Data From Mother Jones' Investigation."). It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. According to the Pew Research Center’s 2013 survey, 58% Americans think that a strict law against gun use would spell a risk to the safety of their families. Despite many American civilians in favor of keeping the second … Gun control = more lives lost. The immediate result would be a reduction in violent crime. ~Scarlet City http://eepurl.com/dcyZMn. That percentage is not high enough to justify the use of a gun. 1985, deaths by revolver: 8092 in the US, 47 in Japan, 35 in Canada, * in the United Kingdom and 5 in Australia. In American politics, gun control has been an intractable and one of the most controversial issues. She doesn’t argue that specific types of guns should be banned, but argues that all guns should be banned. ... the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence (hardly a pro-gun organization) ... Voices & Opinion POV: Why Fake Conspiracies Persist, Regardless of the Evidence against Them. So, what is your real purpose in proposing new laws against gun owners? The efficacy of constitutional action, constituting federal regulation of the use of firearms has been promoted via a number of gun control laws enacted since the beginning of the 20th century. Sport shooting, or hunting, or a gun culture that glamorizes and legitimizes unnecessary gun ownership can desensitize ordinary people to the fatal effects of guns and firearms in general. Pro Gun Control Essay In the U.S. about 88.9 guns are owned for every 100 people (Zakaria, "The Case for Gun Control." The dilemma of the law is that it can be used both ways. I believe that not everyone will handle a gun for self-defense. Gun control regulations Increased cases of gun violence in the United States have resulted in increased calls for stricter gun control regulations. The amendment calls for regulations, but groups similar to the NRA and other anti-gun control people, focus on the part in the amendment where it states that everyone has “the right to bear arms” (Wrinkler, "The Second Amendment Is All for Gun Control." This position is popular among researchers and other experts, so such articles can be found in abundance. ex: Each shooting took place in a "gun free zone". This website uses cookies to improve your experience. How many of those people are actually qualified to have a gun? Recently, in many cases guns have gotten into the wrong hands due to lack of an effective system. The pro-gun response is that the deaths from AR’s are a small, small proportion of overall gun homicides, despite the high profile cases. However, the gun has become a part of the national identity of America, a fact that is supported by evidence. Here are some of the most interesting examples: 3 Reasons Doing Nothing Can Actually be Productive, 3 Myths Far Too Many People Believe About the Past. The harsh reality is that it’s not a rosy pretty world out there and being utterly defenseless in a criminal situation is never a good idea. If you take away guns, then all you are doing is supporting the bad guys. Gun control is a touchy topic, but in light of recent shootings I felt the need to elucidate my own opinion on the matter. The investigation into this tragedy raised several questions, there was widespread public opinion that the murderer couldn’t have been so destructive if he lacked access to guns. Even before the bodies were cold in the San Bernardino mass shooting, President Obama called for more gun control. Whether you’re pro gun control or anti gun control, we all know that there’s certain people who should never have guns. Slow down on the Kool Aid they teach you at school. ). This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Bovy tackles the gun issue by arguing that the debate should not be about closing loopholes in gun control. -Voltaire, Favorite Quote:Anything that can be done, can be undone. Could you please explain to your readership that we already have 25,000 + gun laws already in place. YOU JUST WALK INTO A GUN FREE ZONE WITH A GUN THAT IS HOW YOU MORON! And that in all of the murders you mentioned in your article many of those laws were broken. Did you also know that murder is illegal? Bolt-action hunting rifles are made for a specific purpose, to hunt, they do not have high-capacity magazines or an 800-round-per-minute rate of fire. OPINION. On the pro-gun-control side of things, there’s far too much timidity. Sounds swell, but false. Young Americans are open and non-religious, but cool about gun control. Oh, but that was deemed “gun control” by the NRA-backed loonies, and it died quickly. Here are three arguments in support of gun control laws and three more in support of gun ownership. LZ Granderson says calls for gun control in the wake of the Navy Yard shootings are beside the point; they're unrealistic and wouldn't solve the problem. Cristopher Kroeze. Laws only apply to people who abide by them and none of them are murderers. We have more freedoms than any country in the world yet a student such as you would surrender your rights for a false sense of security. For starters, every mass shooting but one in the last 10-20 years has taken place where law abiding people were forbidden to carry a gun but that did nothing to keep out the lunatic who did the shooting. The latest FBI UCR data show that per capita homicide in the U.S. is the lowest it has been since 1963. It is the responsibility of every citizen to determine for himself or herself whether or not the procurement of arms is good for society at large. If you think outlawing guns is the solution to gun violence and mass shootings, keep reading. Using guns for recreation has become a popular sport in the US over the years. We hope you enjoy this website. Easier access to guns is allowing more unqualified people to get possession, and more people, including children killed. The federal law establishes strict registration requirements for procuring a gun, in addition to a transfer tax on machine guns and short-barreled long guns. U.S. President Barack Obama wipes away tears as talks about the victims of the 2012 … Until the anti-gun crowd acknowledges and accepts the fact that it’s an individual committing a crime and not an object, there will never be a consensus from the pro-gun and pro-Constitutional side. Effective gun control measures are a boon to law-abiding citizens and reinforce the constitutional rights. Maybe in some countries there isn't much to reduce. It is important to understand the pros and cons of gun control to understand the debate. A control or restriction is required to ensure that guns are owned by people who intend to use them only in the express need of self-defense and not for crimes. The media’s pro-gun control bias doesn’t just distort news coverage. Criminals do not obey the law that is a fact so how are more laws going to protect us? According to FBI’s crime statistics, in 2010, there were 11,078 murders in the US using firearms. Target-shooting is an Olympic sport, but we don’t see the sportsmen armed with Kalashnikovs or M4 carbines. For most gun owners, owning a firearm is tied to their sense of personal freedom. The answer is an emphatic no. A popular argument often raises the question about why guns are used to protect the President, Congress members and other important people whereas the law prohibits commoners from protecting themselves against criminals. He lived with his mother in a decent neighborhood in Newtown and used her arsenal of guns to go on a bloody rampage. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. Oh yeah, the Internet "loophole". The thing that gun control proponents seem to fail to grasp is that reducing the rate of murder via firearm does not necessarily mean reducing the general murder rate. Unlike other countries where various stringent criteria must be satisfied before one can legally own a gun, Americans can simply say ‘Yes I have a permit, it is the Second Amendment to the Constitution.’The Second Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights specifically states that ‘A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed’. Let’s take a look at some arguments that favor gun control and their rationale in terms of the surplus weapons in the United States. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. And may I add that crime has decreased while firearms ownership has increased during the past ten years,  You definately need to research prior to posting. 6789 Quail Hill Pkwy, Suite 211 Irvine CA 92603. Plenty of people like guns. Any law that proposes to limit the exercise of a right must meet all three prongs of strict scrutiny: it must declare a legitimate "compelling interest". The solution lies with effectively upholding the law and helping the law makers to curb illegal procurement of arms. They ignore the part where it says that there should be some kind of regulations for who can and can’t possess a gun. People who aren’t qualified could have mental issues or a history of criminal acts. Op-Ed: How Republicans can ‘own the libs’ on gun control Many voters, especially in the suburbs, have made it clear they want meaningful gun laws. There are penalties in place and stringent licensing requirements for manufacturers and dealers that are maintained to check on illegal transfers. Without gun control, a gun can get in the wrong hands. After the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut, where an armed man shot 27 people to death, 20 of them first-graders at the Sandy Hook Elementary school, the subject of gun control was once more thrown into the national spotlight. Lets live in a safer world. Society will not become safer by restricting gun ownership as guns don’t kill people, people kill people. It is natural to not agree entirely with the pros or the cons of gun control, but a constant update on statistics should be reviewed and analyzed. Make it harder for Americans to purchase handguns, but can carry them as concealed weapons for protection. Retail firearms traders or individual gun owners can be given compensation if a ban is implemented. By saying children can’t have guns is setting rules and regulations, exactly what gun laws are made to do. Gun control is not the answer: Opposing view. Yes, sometimes guns are used to protect people and for self defense, but only 1.6% of all mass shootings since 1980 were successfully intervened by and armed civilian (Morris, "10 Arguments for Gun Control."). Yes, All of Them. The people who defend gun rights believe that snobbish elites look down on their morals and want to destroy their culture. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. America already has more guns than it has people. In order to protect themselves, their family, and their property, it is a legitimate right of citizens to own weapons. It is a controversial issue, mainly due to the fact that the majority of westernized countries are either opposed to the legality of firearms or have strict procedures and checks for those seeking a license. According to the Pew Research Center’s 2013 survey, 58% Americans think that a strict law against gun use would spell a risk to the safety of their families. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. 54% are of the opinion that gun control can reduce mass shootings. The threat of tyranny is real. These cookies do not store any personal information. Make sure you demonstrate where the implementation of strict gun control resulted in a reduction, we would love to see Hell actually freeze over for the first time ever. During the time when the 2nd amendment was written, there were gun laws.
Maria Ramos Net Worth, Level 3 Teaching Assistant Salary, St Luke's Tiptree, Egifter Promo Code Reddit, Cse 548 Asu, Kraken Intermediate Verification,